
When a patient drops off before enrolling, it is easy to assume they were never serious. Often, that is not what happened. This Health Literacy Month, it is worth naming the quieter reason interested patients walk away: they could not tell whether the clinical trial was relevant to them, what participation would involve, or whether taking the next step was worth it.
Barriers to clinical trial enrollment can begin long before a patient reaches a clinical site. When study information is difficult to understand, willing and eligible patients may struggle to determine whether they qualify, what participation involves, or how to move forward.
Nearly 9 in 10 US adults don’t have proficient health literacy (National Assessment of Adult Literacy, US Department of Education). In Antidote's survey of almost 4,000 patients, the ones who understood clinical research were twice as likely to say they would take part. Interest was not the dividing line. Understanding was.
A protocol is written for researchers and regulators. When that same language reaches a patient as an advertisement, a landing page, or a pre-screening questionnaire, an interested patient can hit friction before they ever reach a clinical site. They may decide the clinical trial is not for them and leave. The clinical site may never know why.
That is what makes this loss so easy to miss. It happens before any funnel report can catch it. A campaign can look healthy on impressions and clicks while the patients who could not read it quietly fall away.
These are some of the barriers to clinical trial enrollment that recruitment teams may overlook. A patient may click an advertisement and still fail to understand the study requirements. Another may begin a pre-screening questionnaire but leave because the questions are confusing. Others may not know what happens after they express interest.
Not every patient who drops off has lost interest. Some never understood clearly enough to take the next step.
Patients are not staying away because they do not care. In our survey, they told us the opposite. They want the industry to make clinical trials easier to understand, and they trust a real person or a fellow patient far more than an advertisement. Give them plain language from a source they trust, and willing patients move forward. Bury the opportunity in clinical terminology, and they disappear.
And the first click is only one place where comprehension can break down. The same friction can appear during pre-screening, follow-up, and the eventual clinical site handoff.
Barriers to clinical trial enrollment can occur at different stages of the patient journey. Even when patients are interested in participating, unclear information and difficult processes can prevent them from taking the next step.
Common barriers include:
Understanding these barriers helps research teams identify where patients may disengage before reaching a clinical site.
Improving patient understanding does not necessarily require more recruitment activity. It may start with making each step easier to understand and complete.
Research teams should also consider practical obstacles that affect participation. Learn more about ways to reduce patient burden in clinical trials.
Research teams can consider the following approaches:
These approaches can help research teams reduce avoidable friction. They do not guarantee enrollment, since patients may also face personal, medical, or logistical barriers.
Common barriers include complex medical language, unclear eligibility criteria, confusing pre-screening processes, communication gaps, and practical challenges that make participation difficult.
Health literacy is the ability to find, understand, and use health information to make informed decisions. In clinical trials, it helps patients understand study requirements, potential risks and benefits, and what participation involves.
When patient-facing materials are difficult to understand, patients may struggle to assess their eligibility or decide whether to participate. Clear, accessible information can help them make informed decisions.
Patients may leave because study information is confusing, eligibility criteria are unclear, or the next steps are not explained. Some potentially eligible patients disengage before a clinical site can assess them.
Research teams can simplify study materials, clarify eligibility requirements, explain next steps, and provide timely follow-up to make enrollment easier to navigate.
Health Literacy Month takes place every October. It raises awareness of the importance of making health information easier to understand and use.